<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> <rss version="2.0"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">   

 
<channel>

<title>Op For</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>vmijpp@hotmail.com</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T16:26:48-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2" />
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:vmijpp@hotmail.com"/>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>

<title>The Best Defense: Survival</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/07/the_best_defense_survival.html</link>
<description>Fans of Outdoor Channel&apos;s outstanding Best Defense series, listen up: The new season is up and running, focusing on survival, or &quot;prepping&quot; if you prefer. I&apos;m watching Episode 1 right now. Good stuff....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2305@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fans of <a href="http://www.outdoorchannel.ccom">Outdoor Channel's </a>outstanding <em>Best Defense </em>series, listen up: <a href="http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php?topic=7421.0">The new season </a>is up and running, focusing on survival, or "prepping" if you prefer.</p>

<p>I'm watching Episode 1 right now. Good stuff.</p><p><a href="http://op-for.com/2009/07/the_best_defense_survival.html" title="Continue Reading: The Best Defense: Survival">Continued reading The Best Defense: Survival...</a><p class="font-family:Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:11px; color: #333333; background-color: #f5f5f5; border: 1px solid #c0c0c0; padding-top: 2px; padding-right: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-left: 4px; display: block;"></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2305" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/07/the_best_defense_survival.html#comments" title="Comment on: The Best Defense: Survival">Comments (1)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(Juan on
Jul  1, 2009  8:35 PM)

Holy shit Marcus Luttrell is on there!  I'm definitely watching it now. </p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Firearms</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T16:26:48-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Strike Of The Sword</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/07/strike_of_the_sword.html</link>
<description>Marines wield their terrible swift sword in Helmand Province: WASHINGTON — U.S. Marines and Afghan security forces moved into Taliban-infested villages Wednesday evening in one of the Obama administration&apos;s first major military operations in the previously forgotten war in Afghanistan....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2304@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529788,00.html">Marines wield their terrible swift sword in Helmand Province:</a></p>

<blockquote>WASHINGTON —  U.S. Marines and Afghan security forces moved into Taliban-infested villages Wednesday evening in one of the Obama administration's first major military operations in the previously forgotten war in Afghanistan. ...

<p>Dubbed Operation Khanjar, or "Strike of the Sword," the military push was described by officials as the largest and fastest-moving of the war's newest phase. British forces last week led similar missions to fight and clear out insurgents in Helmand and Kandahar provinces.</blockquote></p>

<p>Looks like they're aiming for the right objective:</p>

<blockquote>"Where we go we will stay, and where we stay, we will hold, build and work toward transition of all security responsibilities to Afghan forces," Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Larry Nicholson said in a statement.</blockquote>

<p>Good luck, Marines. It's the first step in a long march.</p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2304" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/07/strike_of_the_sword.html#comments" title="Comment on: Strike Of The Sword">Comments (3)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(devildoc on
Jul  1, 2009  6:58 PM)

Talked with a 7th SFG operator today.  He is leaving soon for his 4th tour in Afghanistan.  They are worried that Karzai will be relected and things will fall apart like it has in Iran.  Semper Fi devil dogs!!!</p>
<p>(<a href="http://gopcounterculture.com/" rel="nofollow">GOP</a> on
Jul  2, 2009  3:36 AM)

Get some.</p>
<p>(Tobias Karadut on
Jul  2, 2009  6:00 AM)


Go get some Marines.
Semper Fi.

Best wishes from Germany.
Tobias.</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T16:18:22-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Colonel Kenneth Reusser, USMC; 1920-2009</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/colonel_kenneth_reusser_usmc_1.html</link>
<description>A three-war Marine and double Navy Cross recipient died recently-- Colonel Kenneth &quot;Kannibal Ken&quot; Reusser. He was an archetype of the hard-fighting hard-flying Marine aviator, as his two Navy Cross citations will attest. The action in which he and his...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2303@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A three-war Marine and double Navy Cross recipient died recently-- <a href="http://blog.oregonlive.com/oregonatwar/2009/06/kenneth_reusser_1920_2009.html">Colonel Kenneth "Kannibal Ken" Reusser</a>. He was an archetype of the hard-fighting hard-flying Marine aviator, as <a href="http://www.militarytimes.com/citations-medals-awards/recipient.php?recipientid=5890">his two Navy Cross citations </a>will attest. The action in which he and his wingman "ate" the Jap plane is <a href="http://www.aviationartcentral.com/detail.asp?product_ID=durr003">memorably illustrated in LtCol Alex Durr's painting</a>. </p>

<p>Towards the end of his life it looks like he got a bad break, and then a raw deal on top of it. I wish the guy who swindled him could get his ass chopped off by a Corsair prop. But, if he's serving time, that might not be far from the truth...</p>

<p>It's been a bad month for hard-core Old Corps Marine flyers. Here's to you, Col Reusser. </p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2303" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/colonel_kenneth_reusser_usmc_1.html#comments" title="Comment on: Colonel Kenneth Reusser, USMC; 1920-2009">Comments (2)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(JohnW on
Jun 30, 2009  5:09 AM)

One of my favorite WW2 stories.  I didn't realize there was a painting, thanks for pointing that out.</p>
<p>(Wilbur on
Jul  1, 2009  2:28 AM)

amazing- I heard this story years ago, and chalked it up as a military equivlant of an urban legend. Nice to see it was true!</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Our Beloved Corps</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-29T16:34:01-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Haze-Gray, Underway, and HEARD-FROM-TODAY</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/hazegray_underway_and_heardfro.html</link>
<description>Got a nice note this morning from Brother Rat Doc H, saying that he&apos;s finally headed outbound for Afghanistan. It&apos;ll probably be a few days (or more) before he posts again, but go leave him a comment and wish him...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2302@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a nice note this morning from Brother Rat Doc H, saying that he's finally headed <a href="http://dochsia.blogspot.com/2009/06/leaving-on-jet-plane.html">outbound for Afghanistan</a>. </p>

<p>It'll probably be a few days (or more) before he posts again, but go leave him a comment and wish him well. </p>

<p>A VMI grad, former Marine, Navy doctor, wearing ACUs... He's a one-man joint operation.<br />
</p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2302" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/hazegray_underway_and_heardfro.html#comments" title="Comment on: Haze-Gray, Underway, and HEARD-FROM-TODAY">Comments (0)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-29T09:45:02-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Reading and Taking Care of Family</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/reading_and_taking_care_of_fam.html</link>
<description>I&apos;ve been silent most of this week, but not without good reason. I&apos;ve been busy at work-- QDR season, you know-- and for the last few days I&apos;ve been taking care of Honorable Sons One and Two (4 years and...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2301@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been silent most of this week, but not without good reason. I've been busy at work-- QDR season, you know-- and for the last few days I've been taking care of Honorable Sons One and Two (4 years and 1 year, respectively) while Most Honorable Wife is out of town. Wow-- That's a job and a half. We've been having fun, but it's tiring. I've managed to make progress on several little projects, but only by stealing a few minutes here and there, mostly in the <em>early </em>morning.</p><p><a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/reading_and_taking_care_of_fam.html" title="Continue Reading: Reading and Taking Care of Family">Continued reading Reading and Taking Care of Family...</a><p class="font-family:Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:11px; color: #333333; background-color: #f5f5f5; border: 1px solid #c0c0c0; padding-top: 2px; padding-right: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-left: 4px; display: block;"></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2301" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/reading_and_taking_care_of_fam.html#comments" title="Comment on: Reading and Taking Care of Family">Comments (5)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(dnice on
Jun 28, 2009  5:25 PM)

I just finished "Taliban" by Ahmed Rashid which was recommended by Peter Blaber in "The Men The Mission and Me". Great background on Central Asia.

If you havent already Wired for War by PW Singer. Revolutionary comes to mind. Maybe a little off topic and always have to be prepared for technology failing but think how fast technology has changed things in the past 5 years and how fast they will change in the next 5.
</p>
<p>(Hank on
Jun 29, 2009  3:53 AM)

Lt Col P Go to this link http://blog.stevenpressfield.com/ good stuff on afghanistan.</p>
<p>(Doc H on
Jun 29, 2009  4:23 AM)

BR LtCol P,
  The Bear Went Over the Mountain edited by Grau is a good book of the Russian and muj tactics and key terrain.
  My dear wife insisted that I read the Bookseller of Kabul, but I am sure you have better things than that to read.
  I was suprised to read somewhere that Hindu Kush translates into HINDU DEATH after the many bloody british escapes into this region.  
Hope to see you there</p>
<p>(Semper Fi Wife on
Jun 29, 2009  4:58 AM)

Hey Lt. Col. P,
I sent you an email on Saturday but it was returned undeliverable..
Can you please email me when you get a chance?
</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.g2gmart.com" rel="nofollow">runescape gold</a> on
Jul  1, 2009  6:38 PM)

Excellent post!</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>General Interest</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T16:05:05-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Gun-Day Sunday: &quot;And Pass The Ammunition!&quot;</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/gunday_sunday_and_pass_the_amm.html</link>
<description>Gun-Day Sunday to the Nth degree. Here&apos;s the an excerpt from the article published a couple weeks ago, but I saw the good pastor interviewed this a.m. on Fox &amp; Friends: LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A Kentucky pastor is inviting people...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2300@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gun-Day Sunday to the <em>N</em>th degree. Here's the an excerpt from <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525128,00.html">the article published a couple weeks ago</a>, but I saw the good pastor interviewed this a.m. on Fox & Friends:</p>

<blockquote>LOUISVILLE, Ky. —  A Kentucky pastor is inviting people to bring their guns to church to celebrate the Fourth of July and the Second Amendment.

<p>New Bethel Church is welcoming "responsible handgun owners" to wear their firearms inside the church on June 27, a Saturday.</p>

<p>An ad says there will be a handgun raffle, patriotic music and information on gun safety. ... </blockquote></p>

<p>So, instead of bingo in the parish hall, that'd be BANG-o??</p>

<p>I'm all for it. Violence in, at, around churches is if not an everyday occurrence, also not unknown. (See a most timely <a href="http://www.survivalblog.com/2009/06/security_at_places_of_worship.html">Stratfor guest article at Rawles's place </a>for a related topic.) The government of colonial Virginia not once but several times passed laws requiring all able-bodied citizens to go armed to church. And of course the Knights of St John always went armed to chapel, but they were in a class by themselves.</p>

<p>While the shepherd is tending the flock, sheepdogs still have to stand guard.</p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2300" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/gunday_sunday_and_pass_the_amm.html#comments" title="Comment on: Gun-Day Sunday: "And Pass The Ammunition!"">Comments (0)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Firearms</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-28T13:43:49-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Sergeant Major Jacob Vouza</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/sergeant_major_jacob_vouza.html</link>
<description>Suggestion from valued reader and jarhead Marine 6: The [Daily Telegraph&apos;s] obituary (posted below) mentions Sergeant Major Jacob Vouza (not by name) who is one of the most heroic men you will ever have the chance to become acquainted with....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2298@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestion from valued reader and jarhead Marine 6: <em>The [Daily Telegraph's] obituary (<a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/an_unknown_hero.html#comments">posted below</a>) mentions Sergeant Major Jacob Vouza (not by name) who is one of the most heroic men you will ever have the chance to become acquainted with. If you don't know the Vouza story I suggest that you Google him.</em></p>

<p><a href="http://www.solomontimes.com/news.aspx?nwID=2643">Done!</a></p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2298" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/sergeant_major_jacob_vouza.html#comments" title="Comment on: Sergeant Major Jacob Vouza">Comments (0)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>USMC</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-26T06:15:51-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>An Unknown Hero</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/an_unknown_hero.html</link>
<description>While reading the Daily Telegraph on line this AM I came across this obit of a Brit who was instrumental in the USMC success at Guadalcanal. I had seen mention of the exploits of the Coast Watchers at Guadalcanal but...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2297@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While reading the <u><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/military-obituaries/army-obituaries/5626327/Major-Martin-Clemens.html">Daily Telegraph</a> </u>on line this AM I came across this obit of a Brit who was instrumental in the USMC success at Guadalcanal.  I had seen mention of the exploits of the Coast Watchers at Guadalcanal but nothing specific, this provides interesting insight to one individuals contribution.</p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2297" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/an_unknown_hero.html#comments" title="Comment on: An Unknown Hero">Comments (2)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(DreamLiner on
Jun 26, 2009  5:20 AM)

Actually, several books about Guadalcanal or the Pacific Campaign not only do point to the Coast Watchers' immense role but to Clemens in particular as well (off the top of my head I think Richard Frank's Guadalcanal does mention him)</p>
<p>(Marine6 on
Jun 26, 2009  6:10 AM)

Clements, and his Coast Watchers, were a critical part of our effort in the Solomons in the war. They faced certain death if caught by the Japanese, but they stayed at their posts and provided invaluable intelligence.

The obituary mentions Sergeant Major Jacob Vouza (not by name) who is one of the most heroic men you will ever have the chance to become acquainted with. If you don't know the Vouza story I suggest that you Google him.

</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-26T00:35:47-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>E-Mail Tag-Line</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/email_tagline.html</link>
<description>Best e-mail tag-line I&apos;ve seen in a while, and I&apos;m wondering where it came from... &quot;You had a plan, til I punched you in the face.&quot; (Yes, it&apos;s from a Marine.)...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2296@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best e-mail tag-line I've seen in a while, and I'm wondering where it came from...</p>

<p><em>"You had a plan, til I punched you in the face."</em></p>

<p>(Yes, it's from a Marine.)</p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2296" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/email_tagline.html#comments" title="Comment on: E-Mail Tag-Line">Comments (5)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(<a href="http://firearmsandtraining.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Olav</a> on
Jun 23, 2009  4:30 AM)

That came from the great Mike Tyson.

"Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face."</p>
<p>(Bill on
Jun 23, 2009  5:33 AM)

No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.</p>
<p>(Bill on
Jun 23, 2009  5:36 AM)

No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.</p>
<p>(VFRMarine on
Jun 24, 2009  7:12 PM)

Sounds like something the Cookie Monster would say.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.rs-sky.com" rel="nofollow">runescape money</a> on
Jul  1, 2009  6:40 PM)

I feel like time is going incredibly fast and slow at the same time. The weeks/months seem to be crawling...but at the same time, I turn around on Monday and suddenly it is Sunday again 
</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Humor</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-23T01:05:22-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Gun-Day Sunday: Trigger Control, and the K31</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/gunday_sunday_trigger_control.html</link>
<description>Had a great range session this morning with good friend, fellow Marine and frequent commenter MDL. He brought his DS Arms FAL and his straight-pull Swiss K31, of which more anon. I brought the M1 Carbine and the 1911 .45--...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2295@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a great range session this morning with good friend, fellow Marine and frequent commenter MDL. He brought his DS Arms FAL and his straight-pull Swiss K31, of which more anon. I brought the M1 Carbine and the 1911 .45-- of course, since I carry it-- and some odd boxes and clips of ammo, basically to blow the existing low stocks for each. Since I had a limited round count, I decided to focus on trigger control and rapid follow-up shots. </p>

<p>If I came late in life to the True Path of practical shooting, i.e. the teachings of LtCol Jeff Cooper, et al., then I came later still to trigger control, more accurately trigger <em>reset</em>. I don't know why, but I didn't "get" trigger reset until <a href="http://rule308.blogspot.com/2007/06/after-action-report-fpf-trainings-dhs-i.html">I did John Murphy's two-day handgun course</a>. It was indeed a most glorious revelation, and it has greatly improved my abilities. Taming and harnessing trigger reset is the key to rapid, accurate follow-up shots, as in the "controlled pair" and the "failure drill," and all of their manifestations. (If you don't understand what I'm talking about, see below the fold.)</p>

<p>Bottom line is that while you should always strive to know your trigger and master its reset, a low round-count or limited range-time is a great way to evaluate and improve your ability in this critical skill. It is also, I hasten to point out, a fine dry-fire drill as well. And is dry-fire not the foundation for good shooting? </p>

<p>The M1 Carbine performed well. Not flawlessly, but well. I love the way it handles, mounts and points, but the feeding and ejecting needs some attention. I'm using quality ammo, so I don't know if it's magazines or the gun in need of a tune-up. Probably the latter. Anyway, I like that gun, and I'll do what I need to do to get it into fighting trim. MDL shot a full magazine from it, and expressed approval in terms that denoted his desire to acquire one. I have seen that before, and it usually means a visit to  g u n b r o k e r . c o m ...  For my part, I put 20 rounds through his FAL, and felt some lustful urges of my own. Nice piece of gear that, and the .308 "strikes with authority," as John Farnam says.</p>

<p>Speaking of gun-lust, MDL also brought the <a href="http://www.surplusrifle.com/swissk31/index.asp">K31</a>. A beautifully made article, and like he said, with "laser-like accuracy." I can't describe the feeling adequately here, but it was the smoothest bolt-action military rifle I've ever fired. And the six-round group at 50 yards offhand, minus two fliers, was something I'd expect from myself from a supported position with a familiar rifle. That's a rifle that should not be underestimated-- I'd rather face a hundred peasants with AKs than ten trained marksmen with K31s.</p>

<p>Go forth and shoot. And mind your trigger reset; the effort will repay a hundred-fold.</p><p><a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/gunday_sunday_trigger_control.html" title="Continue Reading: Gun-Day Sunday: Trigger Control, and the K31">Continued reading Gun-Day Sunday: Trigger Control, and the K31...</a><p class="font-family:Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:11px; color: #333333; background-color: #f5f5f5; border: 1px solid #c0c0c0; padding-top: 2px; padding-right: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-left: 4px; display: block;"></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2295" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/gunday_sunday_trigger_control.html#comments" title="Comment on: Gun-Day Sunday: Trigger Control, and the K31">Comments (1)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(Michigan Don on
Jun 22, 2009  1:13 AM)

We taught the reset concept in the department, and were also impressed, and impressed the members. Cool.

</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Firearms</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-21T13:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>&quot;Fix Bayonets&quot;</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/fix_bayonets.html</link>
<description>From today&apos;s Washington Post Magazine, a portrait of 2d Battalion, 7th Marines-- &quot;2/7&quot;. The problem was, Karell didn&apos;t know what to expect. He was from Arlington. He&apos;d traveled the world. This place, though, was like nowhere he&apos;d ever been. The...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2294@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From today's Washington Post Magazine, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/12/AR2009061202123.html">a portrait of 2d Battalion, 7th Marines</a>-- "2/7".</p>

<blockquote>The problem was, Karell didn't know what to expect. He was from Arlington. He'd traveled the world. This place, though, was like nowhere he'd ever been. The 2nd Battalion of the 7th Marine Regiment had deployed to Afghanistan last spring to train Afghan police. But when Karell's platoon arrived in Now Zad, the largest town in a remote northern district of Helmand province, they'd rolled into a ghost town. 

<p>The Afghans who used to live here, more than 10,000, had been gone for several years, their abandoned mud-brick homes slowly melting into the dusty valley. Insurgents were using the place for R&R. At night, all you heard were the jackals, ululating like veiled, grieving women. The fact that Now Zad had no civilian residents, much less any police, had somehow escaped the notice of the coalition planners who had given the Marines their mission. </blockquote></p>

<p>A true "What now, Lieutenant?" moment. Good article, go read. The author'll also be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/06/16/DI2009061602820.html">online tomorrow for a Q&A</a>.<br />
</p><p><a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/fix_bayonets.html" title="Continue Reading: "Fix Bayonets"">Continued reading "Fix Bayonets"...</a><p class="font-family:Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:11px; color: #333333; background-color: #f5f5f5; border: 1px solid #c0c0c0; padding-top: 2px; padding-right: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-left: 4px; display: block;"></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2294" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/fix_bayonets.html#comments" title="Comment on: "Fix Bayonets"">Comments (3)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.airjordancity.com" rel="nofollow">air jordans</a> on
Jun 21, 2009 10:33 PM)

Man can only befree through mastery of himself.</p>
<p>(Claudio on
Jun 22, 2009 11:40 PM)

I'm a former soldier (Italian Army), and the article bothered me a lot. I forwarded it to a friend, a serving officer in the US military, with over twenty years of field experience. This included getting shot at, by the way. What follows are his comments. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

The article is odd, in several respects.  

The Lieutentant is pretty old at 29, while his platoon sergeant is younger.  That's a
very unusual combination.

Nobody had ever been across the wall from the Coalition before, but
we'd repeatedly bombed the central bunker and had standing jokes about
it.

We have tight controls over what weapons to use to get the results we
want while minimizing collateral damage, yet we're bombing a hill just
because.

We don't know about the missing population of the town, and naively
expect to find police there.  Nobody bothers to check and see if the
Afghan government is paying police there, has sent officers from that
city to various schools and returned them, etc.

Beleaguered encampment?

How to accomplish the mission wasn't spelled out?  Good.  Doctrinally
it shouldn't be.  Give maximum flexibility to your subordinates since
they are closer to the problem and can better figure out the details.

We're going into new areas, and going to fix them well enough to let
the Afghan Army take over, when we're still holding their hands in
more secure parts of the country?

I've never heard of air cover being denied in Afghanistan unless there
was a higher priority fight going on and simply weren't any birds in
the air because they were still launching the next package.  I've
never heard of medevac being denied for other than weather.  I've
heard of plenty of routine flights denied, so they could concentrate
that minimal helo capacity on priorities.  I'm entertained by the fact
that it takes longer to get support in Afghanistan than in Iraq, might
have something to do with the fewer soldiers spread over the terrain,
and maybe even by the harsher terrain that means you can't just point
your truck in the right direction and move.

Two platoons in combat, a force of perhaps 70 men at most, suffered 26
casualties, some losing limbs, an event which is remarkable for how
seldom it has occurred in the war so far.

EOD trying to defuse an IED, rather than blowing it in place.

Insurgents, who have no reason to expect any coalition forces nearby,
still dash across open spaces with heavy weapons.

WTF is a seven ton truck?   I've seen 5 tons, 10 tens, 2.5 tons, but
never a 7 ton.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

My friend quit on the article at this point. 

I've been following the Long War for a long time. This debacle, had it ever occured, would've been dissected by the MSM in real time, woth the USMC dragged over hot coals. I've found nothing about this at all. 

And then I noticed the Administration-friendly plugin at the end of the article. 

I'm a mere bystander in this war, more's the pity, and salute the proud heirs of the G.I.s that freed my homeland over sixty years ago. I'm now very, very curious to hear what the author has to say. 




</p>
<p>(George Atkisson on
Jun 23, 2009  1:02 AM)

I'm a retired Naval Officer, but my father and brother were Marines.

The expanded account I read yesterday made me so violently angry I made myself wait 24 hours to respond. Not because of the actions of Lt. Karell, but because of the apparent total failure of his superiors to provide the minimal intelligence, air support, and support services that the situation as described so obviously required.

If the initial situation and follow-up tasking and support were as described, some senior officers should be facing courts-martial for dereliction of duty. No way was this acceptable. 

I'm now taking a deep breath, stepping back and reminding myself that I do NOT in fact have access to all the facts or the overall picture. Otherwise I'll just walk around cursing.
</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Afghanistan</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-21T10:23:48-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Who is at War and Who Is Not?</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/who_is_at_war_and_who_is_not.html</link>
<description>I don’t have all the facts, nor do I have all the names, but I have it on good authority, that an Army Official who is the designated Army Representative to meet the remains at Dover Air Force Base was...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2293@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t have all the facts, nor do I have all the names, but I have it on good authority, that an Army Official who is the designated Army Representative to meet the remains at Dover Air Force Base was told, by the Operations Wing Commander, that instead of landing his helicopter at Dover he would have to land at the Regional Airport about twenty miles away and then drive to Dover to meet an Air Force C17 carrying the remains of two Army Soldiers.  Why was this request made?  Because Dover Air Force Base is having an Air Show this weekend, and the arrival of the Helicopter would disrupt the events at the Air Show.  Earlier the same Operations Wing Commander attempted to have the C17 diverted to McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey because it would interfere with the Air Show; apparently someone thought maybe there was something wrong with this.</p><p><a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/who_is_at_war_and_who_is_not.html" title="Continue Reading: Who is at War and Who Is Not?">Continued reading Who is at War and Who Is Not?...</a><p class="font-family:Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:11px; color: #333333; background-color: #f5f5f5; border: 1px solid #c0c0c0; padding-top: 2px; padding-right: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-left: 4px; display: block;"></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2293" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/who_is_at_war_and_who_is_not.html#comments" title="Comment on: Who is at War and Who Is Not?">Comments (26)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(DaveO on
Jun 19, 2009  7:16 PM)

Amen for the Army Air Corps.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://wildbillrants.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">billmill</a> on
Jun 19, 2009 11:45 PM)

I couldn’t agree more, this is an absolute disgrace and heads should roll. I thankfully retired from the AF in Nov 2000 after 20, this after starting my military life in 1978 as a tanker in the USMCR (what was I thinking doing a lateral?) what was going on then was a disgrace but all I’ve seen since is a continued downward spiral. It is now a force with no leadership and accountability except in very few cases. I really knew that the AF was done when the last 1 star list was released in May. I saw some of these men in action as senior Captains; back in the mid 90’s, they were worthless then but to a man very political savvy. This is what happens when you have no warriors in the traditional sense, shoot even most of the rated promotions went to guys who spent more time behind a desk instead of a cockpit.
. I used to think that this was caused due to a lack of training in history and emphasis in esprit de corps like the Marines have. I’ve since concluded that there is simply a lack of a true warrior culture and mentality because the great majority of Airmen are technicians not Grunts, the officer corps is just as bad if not worse.
I worked in fighter aircraft maintenance the majority of my career and came to these conclusions after having to deal with one maintenance officer after another who was clueless. Once in my 17-years on the flight line we had a Mustang who had been a maintainer. Other than that I can count the number of O’s who could contribute on one hand, and both of these very talented people got out instead of playing the political game. We SNCO’s simply did not need them because so few new anything about the weapons systems they had nothing to contribute to the conversation. 
Being the whole Air Force is essentially one big support operation for the real warriors on the ground the  Marine and Army infantry and other combat units. I can’t really see any downside with the majority of the current force falling under Army control and Strategic forces under the Navy, unless of course you are an apple-polishing general Officer who won’t have a job if this happens. Keep up the good work I really enjoy your blog
Semper Fi
BillMill
</p>
<p>(Arcane on
Jun 20, 2009  2:16 AM)

This has nothing to do with the policies of the Air Force... it has to do with FAA regulations. During air shows, the airspace is bound by some very strict regulations that are above and beyond anything you would see normally due to the parameters of the flight plans used by the pilots participating in the airshows. Special NOTAMs are issued by the FAA preventing access to the airspace. These are filed with the FAA at least 30 days in advance. *EVERYTHING* is very carefully scripted. When exceptions are made to the regulations, script, and flight plans, accidents happen. And when accidents happen at air shows, the lives of thousands of people are in danger.

That "Army official" would do well to go get his private pilot's license and learn about how things work before running his mouth.</p>
<p>(Ron Snyder on
Jun 20, 2009  3:56 AM)

Arcane, you are missing the point.  

Which should have priority?  Returning military have have died for our country, or, an Air Show?  A fracking Air Show!

Would be nice for you to comment on the substance of the issue before running your mouth.  </p>
<p>(Marine6 on
Jun 20, 2009  5:42 AM)

Arcane, you are not just missing the point, you're full of c8%#.

If Andrews AFB can conduct an annual air show that runs for three days in May, and still conduct normal operations (Can't you just see someone telling the President, Gee, I'm sorry, we're running an airshow here. You'll have to drive to Richmond to get on Air Force One.) then it can be done at Dover.

What we appear to have in this case is a typical Air Force jerk who is all show, and no go. He needs to be immediately relieved for cause and be sent in to ignoble retirement. </p>
<p>(Red Raven on
Jun 20, 2009  9:57 AM)

Some people here are still acting juvenile.  

It may interfere with some peoples' macho image to hear that there are rules of the road and consequences when violated. There are just some things you do not do, in US air space. 
Regardless of the personal wishes FAA calls the shots. You are taking pot shots at the messenger not the message. 
The idea of returning the AF to Army control, now that would be interesting. Go back to 1939 when each army major unit had assigned Air Assets for their exclusive use. Each Corp might have one B-52 & one B-1 assigned to be at the call of an Army Corps? Maybe have 14 Fighter planes? 

There was a reason for an independent AF, and it was because few Ground Generals had any concept of time and mass effort. 

Lets be realistic, there are few Army units who are dedicated to annihilate potential strategic targets. 
What some are so enthusiastic endorsing is to follow the German and Soviet Air Order of battle for WWII. 

It was much the same bone headed thinking that used Tactical Fighters as Strategic Bombers and Strategic Bombers for Tactical support in Viet Nam. Had a car sales man directing traffic then and look what it got us. 

Say if we go with Organic Air Support do you think the Navy will be there for the Army or only for the Marines? 

Now if the observations is that the an Air Show for the general public is a BMW (big money waste) you will find me in complete agreement. If you want civilian access why not close DFW for 3 days to all routine traffic and not interfere with random Transport arrivals at a military facility. 

What some are suggesting is the routing aircraft through a live fire exercise. An Air Show is basically a live firing exercise with airplanes and jumpers. No problem as long as everyone is on the same page. </p>
<p>(<a href="http://gmapalumni.org/chapomatic/" rel="nofollow">Chap</a> on
Jun 20, 2009 11:08 AM)

I need help understanding the underlying issue.  The officer receiving is inconvenienced, but the fallen soldiers are arriving at the correct place and time and protocol, if I read this correctly.  What am I missing?</p>
<p>(<a href="http://op-for.com" rel="nofollow">John</a> on
Jun 20, 2009 11:13 AM)

Chap, it's a matter of priorities. Air Show should have been temporarily ceased and the crowd asked for a moment of silence while the escort flew in and landed. </p>
<p>(<a href="http://gmapalumni.org/chapomatic/" rel="nofollow">Chap</a> on
Jun 20, 2009 11:58 AM)

Thanks.  I've updated the post.</p>
<p>(possum on
Jun 20, 2009  2:20 PM)

Where to start? Yes, the Wing Commander at Dover may be an officious prick. Yes, as Arcane and Red Raven point out there are regs re air space etc. But the attack on the Air Force is juvenile and malicious. Too may of my brothers have paid the price. My best friend, an A-1 driver, went down on Christmas Eve, 1971, while riding shotgun on a rescue mission over Indian Country. Before that he had saved numerous groundpounder asses flying close support. A-10 s have done the same more recently and they aren't flown by candy ass politicians.
Possum, Laos, Class of '67</p>
<p>(mustang on
Jun 20, 2009  3:35 PM)

I retired from the AF in 1998 with 22 years. I saw the writing on the wall about 1991 when the political correctness began rearing it's ugly head and a new class of officers and some senior enlisted began the "change". Even the vocabulary started changing like we were not suppose to say cockpit and a mess hall was now to be called a "dining facility, barracks were now dormitories, etc.
 The majority of pilots both fighter jocks and heavy. were trying their best to keep the real Air Force intact and the traditions handed down by the likes of LeMay and Arnold. but it looks like it was a losing cause in some cases including this debacle at Dover.
 The Air Force to return to the Army? Thats a good joke as red rider and possum have pointed out.
 My next door neighbor told me he is alive today because of the close in work of a F15-E Strike Eagle pilot.
 The Air Force needs to get back to the "bomb the hell out of them" mentality and away from the college fraternity crap.
 And yes as a Weapons Mech. I too could not figure out why I needed to wear BDU"s instead of the OD fatigues. Camo on a white concrete flightline?? Go figure. </p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.oneloonstales.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">The Loon</a> on
Jun 20, 2009  5:05 PM)

Am just speechless at the dishonour shown to the Fallen and their families and just know that no one would have objected.......just speechless, Sirs.</p>
<p>(ASOC on
Jun 20, 2009  6:15 PM)

Return to AAF?  USAF not pulling their weight?

Pry your head out man.  USAF vehicel maint guys drive and protect convoys every day in the sandbox - other provide EOD or comm services..

Ever hear of TACP/ETAC - the guys with the 'funny' stripes out with the grunts and snuffies -there to provide close air support?  I'm retied USAF and lived/worked/went to the field with the Army.  Do not give me 'they not pulling their weight'.
/rant</p>
<p>(Curtis on
Jun 21, 2009  9:20 AM)

In regards to landing the C-17 in the middle of the airshow, that idea sounds horrible. I seriously doubt that's what the families of those returning troops want. A major media circus, and a couple thousand civvies gawking and snapping photos. 

No. Divert the plane to an alternate site, and otherwise ensure all requisite procedures are followed. 

As far as Air Shows in general go, yeah we should probably ditch or seriously curtail them. We're not having any problems recruiting, and we need the money elsewhere. 

As far as AF leadership in general goes,I seriously doubt we have any more deadwood floating around then the other branches. And if anyones' paying attention, we've now got a heck of a good CSAF in General Schwartz. Former cargo and SOCOM pilot, who's made some surprisingly "No bullshit" calls as of lately. 

I'm in a very maintenance intense career field, but a good number of my coworkers have already been out to the desert(s). (Qatar, Iraq, Afghan, Kuwait, Saudi). One of my SrAs pulled convoy security through Afghanistan, another pulled wrecked vehicles back to base in Iraq, a third counted vehicles coming off of boats in Iraq. The list goes on and on. We don't do anything regarding our AFSC, we're always hole fillers. </p>
<p>(BK on
Jun 21, 2009  4:12 PM)

Townie76,

By not providing any of the original sources and just having us trust one voice out of many who thinks the Air Force isn't doing its fairshare makes it very difficult to carry on an intellectual debate.  While I have no doubts that the helicopter was denied access to the base because of the airshow (there have been several good posts already that explain that issue), we have nothing to go on by conjecture that the C-17 was almost diverted to another base as well.

However, as Curtis points out, not only do I think that this wasn't a bad idea, I think it was the most respectful suggestion the Air Force could have made.  Thousands of civilians wandering around a flightline drinking beer and munching on nachos is not the "honor" that these fallen heroes deserve.  Nor is it the spectacle that their families should be subjected to when those flag draped coffins are brought off the aircraft.  Beyond that, the logistics are also inappropriate.  Those heroes deserve first class service and they deserve to be protected from the nosey/ignorant/malignant who are very likely to be in attendance at the airshow.  Since airshows are open to the public, its difficult to prevent folks with a beef from getting on the base.  These are not the yahoos you want anywhere near the respectful ceremony our heroes should be receiving.  But with thousands of folks moving in close proximity to highly expansive assets, you can bet that security is going to be stretched extremely thin.

Having the C-17 land at McGuire instead of Dover is probably the better option.  I am unaware of any particularly significant reason for Dover to be the receiving base other than the fact that its the usual point of entry.  Hardly an issue of "dishonor" or break of faith with the fallen.</p>
<p>(BK on
Jun 21, 2009  4:22 PM)

WRT Air Force contributions to the war effort...again, already addressed to some extent by earlier posts including CAS, JTACs, and ILO taskings.  But there are additional Air Force bodies out there as well to include ISR liaison officers, WIT Teams (Air Force EOD and Air Force Intel) but most importantly to the ground pounders, I suspect, is the nature of rapid emergency evac.  How many more flag draped coffins would have to be flown back to Dover if the Air Force didn't get them out of country to intensive medical care in Europe and elsewhere?

No, Airmen are not grunts.  They are not trained for and they are not needed for it.  We already have the finest ground forces imagineable in the form of the US Army and Marine Corps.  What we do need are professionals who can execute the Air and Space mission and to date, I've heard little complaint about that.  (Yes, much belly moaning about not enough assets or spending money on F-22s but that's the generals/SECAF/etc, not the pilots/crews/maintaners and support personnel who actually execute.)

Finally, wrt the Air Corps...get over it!  Its not going to happen.  Its like wishing for the days of .25 gasoline.  Ancient history that applied only marginally well at that time and not at all now.

The Air Force does have a strategic role to play.  While Air Force ISR does spend the majority of its time supporting the current fight, not all of it does.  Much of it is dedicated to watching Iran, North Korea, and China (not by our decision but by the Strategic decision-makers, so I don't need a lecture about where the "next" fight is likely to be.)

Though, on that topic, we have been notoriously bad at predicting where the next fight was going to be (and there is plenty of blame to go around for that)..with the exception of Iraq (we got to choose that one.)  So if the predictions are even remotely correct and we do end up taking on China (because predicting that every future war will be like the last is laughable), where's the Army going to be?  That's going to be a Navy and Air Force fight in total. The Marines might get to play, so why doesn't the Army just get rolled in with them?

The Air Force exists separately for a reason.  One that may not be important *right now* or even be apparent to most, but it is there.  There is a reason why the force has evolved over the past 60 years, otherwise, we would still fight exactly was we did in World War II.</p>
<p>(mustang on
Jun 21, 2009  6:46 PM)

BK, both good posts and I might add, the AF right now probably has more taskings than any other branch of the military. Strategic airlift,  tactical and CAS support, space and aerial intel, nukes, medivac, missile defense, etc. the list goes on. 
 And I will add this, I cannot ever remember a Air Force reconnaissance plane ever being forced down and captured intact. (China 2001)</p>
<p>(Lawrence on
Jun 22, 2009  5:26 AM)

Planning an Air Show is no small endeavor.  I'm sure the Air Show planners where giving no foreknowledge of the arrival of the C-17 and the Commander making an immediate decision whether to disrupt the Air Show, or coordinate an alternative landing for the C-17.  Whatever airport the C-17 landed in, the appropriate respect were maintained for the soldier's remains as they move to the next destination.

Maybe we shouldn't get mad at the commander making an immediate decision to separate the two efforts in order to maintain the focus and dignity of both, and look to the planning geniuses who scheduled the C-17 landing and the Air Show at the same time.  Nobody has asked why the Air Show planners didn’t consider something like this happening, robably because they’ve never been faced with such a situation, but now we can hope they include these types of show disruptions in their planning.

Oh, and yeah, those pesky FAA “safety” rules…
</p>
<p>(USMC Steve on
Jun 22, 2009  8:47 AM)

Mustang, you are quite correct.  But then, given that the zoomies used a platform that mach freaking 4 they really were never in any danger at all from the opfor, only from their own potential errors.  Must be nice to run away from danger faster than you can get into it.

The air force is a support branch and nothing more.  They need to learn that along with learning how a MILITARY organization should be operated.  They also need to stop killing our own people.  Check out the number of air force attributed fratricide incidents in first gulf war and second alone.  Hal Moore can tell you about one or two notable ones too.  </p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.checkswithchart.com" rel="nofollow">Fast Nav</a> on
Jun 22, 2009  9:30 AM)

"the AF right now probably has more taskings than any other branch of the military. Strategic airlift, tactical and CAS support, space and aerial intel, nukes, medivac, missile defense, etc. the list goes on."

*cough*bullsh*t*cough*</p>
<p>(Walt White on
Jun 22, 2009  1:41 PM)

This is bullshit, plain and simple. I'm in the Air Force and I can tell you that nothing, NOTHING! should interfere with the fallen's remains. That means inconviencing the escort for even a minute. It's unacceptable, unsatisfactory, and unthinkable. There are a million other solutions than diverting the escort -- sending him away to a civilian facility is WRONG. That a (#%(&#@$987 airshow was the reason for redirecting him is just the icing on the cake. I wish we'd get our heads out of our arses. </p>
<p>(mustang on
Jun 22, 2009  2:59 PM)

Friendly fire, fratricide, what ever you wish to call it is a two way street. Are you saying that artillery and naval gunfire has never caused fratricide??
 Back to topic, if what others have said is true then I say that officer at Dover should be fired for ignorance. But it sounds that there is more to this story than meets the eye.
 And yes Fast Nav, there is a lot of diffrent taskings and missions the AF is doing. I'm not saying the other branches are doing little or nothing.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://gazingattheflag.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Flag Gazer</a> on
Jun 22, 2009  4:34 PM)

37 members of the Air Force and 8 members of the Air Force Reserve have been killed in Afghanistan.

48 members of the Air Force, 3 members of the Air Force Reserve, and 2 Air Force Employees have been killed in Iraq.

That's a lot of death in a war zone for pretending that they are warriors.

You all need to learn some facts and some respect for these men and women.</p>
<p>(Paul on
Jun 23, 2009  8:55 AM)

"Chesley Sullenberger is an American airline transport pilot who successfully carried out the emergency ditching of US Airways Flight 1549 in the Hudson River, offshore from Manhattan, New York City, on January 15, 2009, thus saving the lives of the 155 people on the aircraft."

Saved 155 lives single handed. Not too bad.

He graduated from the United States Air Force Academy. Became a fighter pilot in the USAF. But hey, he was just playing "warrior" right. He isn't a hero, he was just in the USAF. Those silly flight suits.

I think many of you have been terribly disrespectful, and yes I take it personally since my father served in the USAF for 30 years.</p>
<p>(Tantor on
Jun 24, 2009  5:46 AM)

Ignorant Bonehead:  "I realize Air Shows are important to the Air Force. The Air Crews can strut around in their Flight Suits and pretend they are real warriors, and the non-rated types can strut around in their Tiger Stripe Camo Uniforms and pretend they are real warriors. The public will believe all of the hype as they see the latest in the Air Force Hardware and the Air Force pretends they are winning the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan."

While this ignorant bonehead is spouting off, an A-10 unit and an F-15E unit deployed to Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan set a record in May for the most combat flying hours flown in a single month, 5000, in support of the war.  That's five months worth of peacetime flying.

In Afghanistan, the first thing ground troops do when they make contact with the Taliban is call in an airstrike, and they're plenty pissed if those air assets are busy elsewhere.  Most engagements end with air assets neutralizing the threat, ie an F-16 drops bombs on them or an AC-130 gunship tears them to pieces.  In a way, ground troops are almost used as bait to prompt the the Taliban to reveal themselves so that aircraft can pummel them.

All of this is being done by airmen who are apparently some kind of bogus warriors in Mr Ignorant Bonehead's view, maybe even peaceniks.

The Air Force performs a lot of missions beyond the horizon of troops on the ground.  Even though you can't see these tasks being done, they are shaping your battlefield to your advantage and even preempting some battles from ever being fought.  The idea of subordinating the Air Force to the Army has been tried and failed.  That's why we have a separate, independent Air Force.  How about learning from history instead of repeating our mistakes, eh?  Folding the Air Force into the Army makes about as much sense as folding the Navy into the Army.

That said, the chance of an Air Force base commander intentionally disrespecting the returning remains of soldiers killed in battle is zero.  It's just one of those things that's never gonna happen.  I suspect that this is one of those Internet myths born of a little truth and a lot of distortion.  Stop acting like a bunch of hysterical little girls and dial down the outrage, shall we?</p>
<p>(renegade313 on
Jun 26, 2009  2:17 AM)

..sheesh a grunt in F-22.Thats got to scare the chinks..it scares the h@ll out of me....ok enough of the sarcasm,Tantor is spot on,I`m soooo sure there is more to this story than the  tidbit we got..if anything that's may gripe with the AF...every decision must be in triplicate and run thru proper channels,hardly a decision is made with out review.  So to land this flight in the middle of an air show imhho,would upset me if that soldier was my son or daughter,and you can bet you arse I would have a heart to heart with the inconsiderate bastard that didn`t think of the pain it further inflected upon the family..no but hell no...I love my Army buds,but they have a mission,we of the AF have ours...they overlap in places and no where close in others...damn it guys..think...! </p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Air Force</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-19T16:58:12-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Speaking of Good Solid COIN Advice</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/speaking_of_good_solid_coin_ad.html</link>
<description>I&apos;m halfway into Chris Cocks&apos; Fireforce, an inside look at 3 Commando, Rhodesian Light Infantry. The RLI&apos;s actions during the Rhodesian Bush War are a fascinating case-study in modern COIN ops -- some of their tactics groundbreaking (like the Fireforce...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2292@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm halfway into <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fireforce-Mans-Rhodesian-Light-Infantry/dp/0958489092/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1245339417&sr=8-1#">Chris Cocks' Fireforce</a>, an inside look at 3 Commando, Rhodesian Light Infantry. The RLI's actions during the Rhodesian Bush War are a fascinating case-study in modern COIN ops -- some of their tactics groundbreaking (like the Fireforce concept, a highly effective aerial envelopment technique), others just stupid (like the RLI's strict "White's Only" rule). Don't have time for a big review, just think that any students of COIN ops should read into the Rhodesian War aggressively. Much to learn, both from their monumental successes and strategic failure. </p>

<p>Many thanks to Col P for initially sparking my interest in the Bush War, this must be the sixth book I've read on the subject. <br />
</p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2292" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/speaking_of_good_solid_coin_ad.html#comments" title="Comment on: Speaking of Good Solid COIN Advice">Comments (3)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(wilbur on
Jun 19, 2009  1:53 AM)

Damn fine book. Best infantry memoir I've ever read.

</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.airjordancity.com" rel="nofollow">air jordans</a> on
Jun 21, 2009 10:30 PM)

One old person complained to the doctor that his right ear was giving him trouble; he couldn't hear.
So the doctor checked, checked, checked, listened, listened and said, "Oh, you know your ear trouble is an old age problem? Your ear is getting old, that's all.That's why you can't hear."So the patient said, "Nonsense, the left ear is just as old. </p>
<p>(Skinner on
Jun 23, 2009  2:38 PM)

I am a Rhodesian (now and American by choice) and I am pleased to read this.

There is much to learn from the success of the Rhodesian forces that can be applied to our current wars - and future ones.

The birth of the Rhodesian tactics came out of the successful war against the communists in the jungles of Malaya.

My father was one of several Rhodesian volunteers in that war, his CO was Ron Reid-Daley who went on to become General Reid-Daley overseeing the Rhodesian Army and its development of COIN techniques and units.

He was also the "father" of the Selous Scouts.

The Rhodesian Malay Scouts went on to become C Squadron, Rhodesia Regiment, Special Air Service - a very, very quiet unit that was very, very successful in silence throughout our bush war.

I take personally your chiding of the RLI being all white.

Black Rhodesians did not have to fight (unlike white males who at 18 were headed off on "call-up", the draft).

This did not deter many black Rhodesians who joined many units in the Army, AF and Police.

The Rhodesian African Rifles, the black regiment, had a proud history going back to WWI.

And the unltra tough Selous Scouts were over 80% black, with all the white troopers fluent in Shona and Matabele.

Please understand Rhodesians got along well, black and white.  Hard to explain to you, you had to live it.

Keep up the great blog.</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Counterinsurgency</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-18T07:37:55-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>GOOD SOLID C.O.I.N. ADVICE</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/good_solid_coin_advice.html</link>
<description>The Torch highlights some good solid COIN advice found at Ricks&apos; blog, and one excerpt is worth repeating here: &quot;7. Most important of all. The enemy must understand that you are ready to go to the end to win the...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2291@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://toyoufromfailinghands.blogspot.com/2009/06/hard-nosed-approach-to.html">The Torch highlights some good solid COIN advice </a>found at Ricks' blog, and one excerpt is worth repeating here:</p>

<blockquote>"7. Most important of all. The enemy must understand that you are ready to go to the end to win the war. That means a resolve for the long slog and a stomach for attrition. If the enemy thinks that you develop feet of clay rather quickly, he will continue fighting."</blockquote>

<p>Oh, yes indeed. As I've stated before, this is where I think we as a nation are headed off the rails. I hope we adjust our course before it gets adjusted for us.</p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2291" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/good_solid_coin_advice.html#comments" title="Comment on: GOOD SOLID C.O.I.N. ADVICE">Comments (1)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(Doc H on
Jun 18, 2009  3:54 AM)

  I have heard more than one administration and pentagon official attach a timeline to our current Afghanistan surge.  Certainly seems like a good time for Mullah O to lay low and regroup.
  It may take decades to win in Afghanistan.  It is not the same country as Iraq.  The main factor that will determine how rapidly this conflict comes to a conclusion is the effectiveness of the 
Afghan Army and Police in fighting their own war.  </p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Counterinsurgency</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-18T00:22:56-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>

<title>Army Tears Down the Cyber Wall: Facebook, Twitter, Flickr No Longer Blocked</title>
<link>http://op-for.com/2009/06/army_tears_down_the_cyber_wall.html</link>
<description>This could be the most logical shit I&apos;ve heard in a while -- &quot;These are sites that soldiers are encouraged to use to get the Army message out. The Army has a presence on these sites. ... There is no...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2290@http://op-for.com/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be the most logical shit I've heard in a while -- <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/16/army-eases-e-mail-networking-rules/">"These are sites that soldiers are encouraged to use to get the Army message out. The Army has a presence on these sites. ... There is no reason to block them" </a><br />
 <br />
Being a blue-suiter, it's always a little shocking to hear of military units snubbing the safer path in favor of what's best for the service. I'm just not used to it. Here's hoping that the Air Force figures out what everyone already knows. Crossing my fingers, but not holding my breath. <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/06/army-orders-bases-stop-blocking-twitter-facebook-flickr/">Danger Room had the original scoop. </a><br />
</p></p>
<p>
<a href="http://op-for.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2290" onclick="OpenTrackback(this.href); return false">TrackBack (0)</a> | <a href="http://op-for.com/2009/06/army_tears_down_the_cyber_wall.html#comments" title="Comment on: Army Tears Down the Cyber Wall: Facebook, Twitter, Flickr No Longer Blocked">Comments (2)</a></p>
<p>Comments on this Entry:</p>

<p>(Doug on
Jun 17, 2009  6:26 AM)

I think it was pretty embarrassing for the Army to block these services. It made the Army look like the Iranian and Chinese governments!</p>
<p>(Mike on
Jun 18, 2009  4:51 PM)

We'll see how it actually gets executed at the individual level ... remember that "local commanders" can always be more restrictive. 

More to the point, we'll see how everyone reacts the minute the 1st guy screws up ... anyone remember the thumb drive incident?</p>
</description>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:subject>Tech</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-06-16T13:15:23-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>